<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After Hall Street, does the Texas Arbitration Act let the parties agree to judicial review?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5844</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Supreme Court Declines to Follow Hall Street in Arbitration Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 22:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/#comment-5844</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] and Justice Lehrmann, issued a concurring  opinion.  Find links to the case briefs at the Supreme Court of Texas Blog&#8217;s Docked DB (here). Our previous post about this case is [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and Justice Lehrmann, issued a concurring  opinion.  Find links to the case briefs at the Supreme Court of Texas Blog&#8217;s Docked DB (here). Our previous post about this case is [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas chooses not to follow Hall Street, permits arbitration agreements to have formal appellate review by Texas courts</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5842</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas chooses not to follow Hall Street, permits arbitration agreements to have formal appellate review by Texas courts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 18:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/#comment-5842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is the long-awaited decision about whether the rule the U.S. Supreme Court announced in Hall Street &#8212; which held that [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the long-awaited decision about whether the rule the U.S. Supreme Court announced in Hall Street &mdash; which held that [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Supreme Court Hears &#8216;Manifest Disregard of the Law&#8217; Case: Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall Street &#171; Disputing</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Supreme Court Hears &#8216;Manifest Disregard of the Law&#8217; Case: Standards of Judicial Review for Arbitration Awards After Hall Street &#171; Disputing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/case-notes/after-hall-street-does-the-texas-arbitration-act-let-the-parties-agree-to-judicial-review/#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] reported by the Texas Supreme Court Blog (thanks for the cite!) the Texas Supreme Court heard arguments today on the case NAFTA Traders, [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reported by the Texas Supreme Court Blog (thanks for the cite!) the Texas Supreme Court heard arguments today on the case NAFTA Traders, [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

