<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cases in the News 6-21-2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/cases-in-the-news-6-21-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/cases-in-the-news-6-21-2008/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Cruse</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/cases-in-the-news-6-21-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Cruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=225#comment-386</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;For both of these cases, I got my information about the underlying trial proceedings from the court of appeals opinion.  (The Fort Worth opinion is linked above as the name of the case; the two Austin opinions are linked separately.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your comment prompted me to look back at both, and I&#039;ve just corrected my entry about the Austin case to reflect that the trial court rendered judgment after a bench trial, not on summary judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For both of these cases, I got my information about the underlying trial proceedings from the court of appeals opinion.  (The Fort Worth opinion is linked above as the name of the case; the two Austin opinions are linked separately.)</p>

<p>Your comment prompted me to look back at both, and I&#8217;ve just corrected my entry about the Austin case to reflect that the trial court rendered judgment after a bench trial, not on summary judgment.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Philips</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/cases-in-the-news-6-21-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Philips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=225#comment-385</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious where you got the summary judgment information.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious where you got the summary judgment information.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

