<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federal suit against the Texas Supreme Court asking for a quicker ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal lawsuit against the Texas Supreme Court goes out with a whimper</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-3561</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal lawsuit against the Texas Supreme Court goes out with a whimper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1580#comment-3561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] case (DocketDB) got some unusual attention when the Respondent (a putative class representative) filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that the time the Texas Supreme Court was taking to issue its decision violated [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] case (DocketDB) got some unusual attention when the Respondent (a putative class representative) filed a federal lawsuit, arguing that the time the Texas Supreme Court was taking to issue its decision violated [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New grant about calculating child support in divorce (Orders of May 7, 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-3378</link>
		<dc:creator>New grant about calculating child support in divorce (Orders of May 7, 2010)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1580#comment-3378</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Marketing on Hold sounds familiar, it&#8217;s the case that was at the center of the lawsuit filed against the Court for not deciding a case more quickly. The Court soon ruled, and the losing party sought [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing on Hold sounds familiar, it&#8217;s the case that was at the center of the lawsuit filed against the Court for not deciding a case more quickly. The Court soon ruled, and the losing party sought [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four opinions, with the first dissents and concurrence of the Term [Feb. 19, 2010]</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Four opinions, with the first dissents and concurrence of the Term [Feb. 19, 2010]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1580#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] No. 05-0748 (docket and briefs). This is the very same case in which the class representative filed suit against the Justices of the Texas Supreme Court last week. Today, the Court decided, by a 5-3 vote, that the class representative did not [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No. 05-0748 (docket and briefs). This is the very same case in which the class representative filed suit against the Justices of the Texas Supreme Court last week. Today, the Court decided, by a 5-3 vote, that the class representative did not [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/news-and-links/federal-suit-against-the-texas-supreme-court-asking-for-a-quicker-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1580#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds like one of those research projects I get every once in a while when a trial lawyer comes in my office and asks, &quot;I need you research whether I can [fill in the blank with very bad idea]&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the only good response to such a request is, &quot;Why in the world would ever do that?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like one of those research projects I get every once in a while when a trial lawyer comes in my office and asks, &#8220;I need you research whether I can [fill in the blank with very bad idea]&#8220;</p>

<p>Sometimes the only good response to such a request is, &#8220;Why in the world would ever do that?&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
