<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Order List of 4-25-2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-4-25-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-4-25-2008/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:11:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 020033</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-4-25-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>020033</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=172#comment-330</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While I despise Texas Watch and the blatant political agenda it pushes without any legal objectivity or expertise, I do find it curious that the Court has had such a remarkable stretch of productivity on the heels of the furor stirred up by Texas Watch&#039;s criticism of the Court&#039;s opinion delay.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe I should despise them a little less.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I despise Texas Watch and the blatant political agenda it pushes without any legal objectivity or expertise, I do find it curious that the Court has had such a remarkable stretch of productivity on the heels of the furor stirred up by Texas Watch&#8217;s criticism of the Court&#8217;s opinion delay.</p>

<p>Maybe I should despise them a little less.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
