<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Order List for June 5, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-june-5-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-june-5-2009/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: No opinions; TxSG amicus about takings via the police power [Order List for Dec. 3, 2009]</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-june-5-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator>No opinions; TxSG amicus about takings via the police power [Order List for Dec. 3, 2009]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/orders/order-list-for-june-5-2009/#comment-2351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] when the exercise of the state&#8217;s police power could violate the takings clause. The Court had invited the views of the Texas solicitor general in June, and that office filed a brief in September.1  A quick scan of the brief&#8217;s Table of [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when the exercise of the state&#8217;s police power could violate the takings clause. The Court had invited the views of the Texas solicitor general in June, and that office filed a brief in September.1  A quick scan of the brief&#8217;s Table of [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

