<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Supreme Court takes more steps toward electronic filing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/texas-supreme-court-takes-more-steps-toward-electronic-filing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/texas-supreme-court-takes-more-steps-toward-electronic-filing/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Make PDF E-Briefs for the Texas Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/texas-supreme-court-takes-more-steps-toward-electronic-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-3415</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Make PDF E-Briefs for the Texas Supreme Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1859#comment-3415</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] before the conference. How do you see electronic briefs affecting written advocacy?  The Court made a few tweaks to the rule (primarily about emailed copies) effective May 31. [&#8617;] I chose to host the guide at Google [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] before the conference. How do you see electronic briefs affecting written advocacy?  The Court made a few tweaks to the rule (primarily about emailed copies) effective May 31. [&#8617;] I chose to host the guide at Google [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/texas-supreme-court-takes-more-steps-toward-electronic-filing/comment-page-1/#comment-3374</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/?p=1859#comment-3374</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But what&#039;s the point of snail mail if you have to e-mail the brief.  Where&#039;s the strategerie in that?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I confess to wanting the convenience and civility and tree-huggery of e-filing; but, the writer in me knows that screen reading is just not the same as paper.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what&#8217;s the point of snail mail if you have to e-mail the brief.  Where&#8217;s the strategerie in that?  </p>

<p>I confess to wanting the convenience and civility and tree-huggery of e-filing; but, the writer in me knows that screen reading is just not the same as paper.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

