<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Supreme Court expands electronic briefing through a tech-savvy order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/</link>
	<description>Legal Issues Before the Texas Supreme Court</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Cruse</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/comment-page-1/#comment-3084</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Cruse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/#comment-3084</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;John:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No rumor.  The Texas Supreme Court is still requiring paper briefs.  (Here&#039;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/starting-today-electronic-copies-of-texas-supreme-court-briefs-are-mandatory/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post I wrote about it today&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree that a pure electronic system could have cost advantages for litigants.   One step in getting there is making the key decision makers (and there are nine of them) comfortable using PDF briefs for their day-to-day work.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the new rule is a big success, then we will be one step closer to true electronic filing in the Texas Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>

<p>No rumor.  The Texas Supreme Court is still requiring paper briefs.  (Here&#8217;s the <a href="http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/starting-today-electronic-copies-of-texas-supreme-court-briefs-are-mandatory/" rel="nofollow">post I wrote about it today</a>.</p>

<p>I agree that a pure electronic system could have cost advantages for litigants.   One step in getting there is making the key decision makers (and there are nine of them) comfortable using PDF briefs for their day-to-day work.  </p>

<p>If the new rule is a big success, then we will be one step closer to true electronic filing in the Texas Supreme Court.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>John Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve heard a disturbing rumor that the Supreme Court will still require paper even after documents can be filed electronically.  I hope it isn&#039;t true.  Given the tough economic times, the Court should be doing everything it can to keep costs down.  Electronic filing can help reduce the amount of staff necessary to file and prepare briefs.  But if we still have to file paper briefs, much of the efficiency and cost savings will be lost.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard a disturbing rumor that the Supreme Court will still require paper even after documents can be filed electronically.  I hope it isn&#8217;t true.  Given the tough economic times, the Court should be doing everything it can to keep costs down.  Electronic filing can help reduce the amount of staff necessary to file and prepare briefs.  But if we still have to file paper briefs, much of the efficiency and cost savings will be lost.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendall Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/comment-page-1/#comment-2450</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendall Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/#comment-2450</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;applause&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now, I hope the clerk&#039;s office actually enforces it.  I&#039;ve noted several petitions that were ordered redrawn in the last several rounds of orders and a disturbing number of references to &quot;points of error.&quot;   Query whether pdf is in the cards for them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;sigh&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>applause</strong></p>

<p>Now, I hope the clerk&#8217;s office actually enforces it.  I&#8217;ve noted several petitions that were ordered redrawn in the last several rounds of orders and a disturbing number of references to &#8220;points of error.&#8221;   Query whether pdf is in the cards for them.</p>

<p><strong>sigh</strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David George</title>
		<link>http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>David George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scotxblog.com/practice-notes/with-a-smart-order-the-texas-supreme-court-expands-electronic-briefing/#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone else find it ironic that the Court&#039;s order requiring PDFs of briefs to be created electronically and not scanned was, itself, scanned and not created electronically?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else find it ironic that the Court&#8217;s order requiring PDFs of briefs to be created electronically and not scanned was, itself, scanned and not created electronically?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

